What's allowed in Cuba — and what isn't
Every asset on this atlas sits under two legal regimes at once, and you must satisfy both: U.S. sanctions law decides what a U.S. person may touch at all, and Cuban domestic law decides what a foreigner may own or do inside Cuba. A deal that is legal in Havana can still be a felony in Miami. This page is the plain-English map of both — with primary sources where we have them, and an honest flag where the law is unsettled.
Not legal advice. This page maps the law to its primary sources — the OFAC regulations, the statutes, and the official lists linked below — and an automated monitor checks those sources for changes every week. Sanctions law still turns on specifics and can move between updates; confirm any transaction with qualified OFAC sanctions counsel before acting.
There is no equity lane for U.S. persons. No U.S. OFAC general license authorizes a U.S. person to take an ownership stake in a Cuban enterprise — full stop. Cuba's own law is now moving the other way: the June 2026 reform package (~176 measures) formally opens foreign and diaspora equity on the Cuban side (see Reform Watch). But that changes nothing on the U.S. side — until OFAC issues an equity license, the clearly framed path for a U.S. person to back a Cuban entrepreneur is remittance / payment support under the applicable CACR rules (notably §515.570(g)(3)), often via a sanctions-aware rail such as QvaPay — not equity, and not a determination that any specific transfer is authorized. That is why this site says "support," never "invest."
The support lane — remittance and payment support to independent entrepreneurs under scoped CACR rules — is narrow and conditional, not a green light. Trump's NSPM-5 (June 30, 2025) reissued the hard-line Cuba policy: it reaffirmed the statutory tourism ban, directed OFAC to tighten the CACR, and directed OFAC to broaden the definition of "prohibited Government of Cuba officials" (§515.337) — which would shrink who qualifies as a genuinely independent entrepreneur. The Biden-era private-sector general licenses remain in effect only until OFAC amends the regulations, so treat the lane as subject to change. Every recipient must be screened as genuinely independent — not a prohibited official or Communist Party member — and settlement must avoid GAESA and the state entirely.
On May 1, 2026, Executive Order 14404 (91 FR 25061) added an IEEPA-based Cuba sanctions program on top of the CACR. It authorizes blocking foreign persons who operate in Cuba's energy, defense, metals-and-mining, financial-services, or security sectors, who are owned or controlled by the Government of Cuba, or who materially support blocked persons — and its Section 4 authorizes secondary sanctions on foreign financial institutions that facilitate significant transactions for blocked persons. Through 2026, OFAC and the State Department designated a cascade of regime entities and officials under this authority.
What this means for the support lane: EO 14404 expressly preserves CACR-authorized activity — Section 2(b) says its blocking authority “shall not apply to activities authorized by… any license issued pursuant to part 515.” So the private-sector general licenses survive — §515.570 remittances (incl. (g)(3)), §515.582 import-tied payments, and §515.584(h)(2) entrepreneur accounts. (§515.584(d), the U-turn authorization, is a bank-clearing rule for transfers between non-U.S. parties, not part of this lane — see below.) What changed is the danger zone around them: the pool of blocked Cuban persons expanded sharply, and a payment that reaches a designated person — or a foreign bank that facilitates one — is now exposed. Steering clear means screening every party against the expanded designations and keeping the recipient a genuinely independent private-sector entrepreneur — never a designated, state, GAESA/MININT/MINFAR, or 50%+-blocked-owned counterparty (OFAC's 50 Percent Rule). Screen with QvaPay Sentinel and structure with OFAC counsel.
1 · The U.S. side (sanctions law)
The embargo baseline is the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR Part 515): for a U.S. person, transactions with Cuba are prohibited unless authorized, and §515.201(c) independently bans structuring around the rules. A narrow set of general licenses opens a private-sector lane.
- ✓Remittances under §515.570 — including (g)(3) remittances to support private-business development and non-state activity by independent private sector entrepreneurs (§515.340), plus family/donative remittances with their own limits.
- ✓Importing certain goods & services from independent entrepreneurs — everything except the categories the State Department's §515.582 List excludes — and payments necessary to those imports, with documentary proof of independent status. (Fed. Reg. 2024-11618)
- ✓Internet-based services (§515.578) and mail/telecommunications transactions (§515.542) — not a general “payment platform” license.
- ✓U.S. bank accounts opened solely in the name of a Cuban independent private-sector entrepreneur, for authorized transactions (§515.584(h)).
- ✓“U-turn” transfers — U.S. banks may process Cuba-related transfers that originate and terminate outside the U.S., neither party a U.S. person (§515.584(d), reauthorized 2024). Not a U.S.-person channel to send money to Cuba.
- ✕Equity in any Cuban enterprise. No general license authorizes it — it would need a specific OFAC license.
- ✕Paying a "prohibited" Cuban. The recipient must be a genuinely independent entrepreneur; prohibited Government of Cuba officials (§515.337) and Communist Party members (§515.338) are ineligible — and NSPM-5 (2025) directed OFAC to broaden that class.
- ✕Any transaction with GAESA / Restricted-List / SDN entities. GAESA has been on the Cuba Restricted List since 2017 and the OFAC SDN List since December 21, 2020.
- ✕Lodging at a Prohibited Accommodations List hotel; any confiscated-property nexus → Helms-Burton Title III treble-damages liability (Title III suits have been allowed since 2019); Title IV visa bars.
- ✕Payments or inducements to Cuban officials — FCPA plus sanctions exposure.
2 · On the ground in Cuba (Cuban law)
Foreign investment is governed by Law No. 118 of 2014 and its implementing regulation (MINCEX, marco legal). Cuban law lets foreigners invest — but almost always with the state, in approved projects, never by quietly buying a state asset or a private shop.
- ✓Foreign investment through three forms: a joint venture (empresa mixta), an international economic association contract (AEI), or a wholly-foreign-owned enterprise. (Ley 118)
- ✓In all sectors except health & education for the population and the armed forces (bar their enterprise systems).
- ✓Repatriate profits freely abroad in convertible currency, with no transfer tax.
- ✓Protection from expropriation except declared public-utility, with indemnification at commercial value in convertible currency.
- ✓Up to 100% foreign ownership inside the Mariel Special Development Zone (ZED Mariel).
- ✓Operate private MIPYMEs (≤100 employees).
- ✕Buying a Cuban state asset outright. State-asset deals must be approved by the state (MINCEX → Council of Ministers, or delegated ministry heads) and fit the Cartera de Oportunidades portfolio.
- ✕Investing in health/education-to-population or the armed forces' sectors.
- ✕Foreign/diaspora equity — newly opened, scope settling. The June 2026 reform package (~176 measures) formally allows foreign and diaspora equity in state and large private firms, but the MIPYME-specific scope and mechanics are still being written — and it does not help a U.S. person, who still can't take equity under OFAC. Treat as counsel-required.
- ✕Routing money through the military conglomerate GAESA and its arms (CIMEX, Gaviota, FINCIMEX, Almacenes Universales) — which control ports, tourism, retail and the remittance rails.
Eligibility definition & authorizing GLs
§515.340 is a definition, not a license. The general licenses below each have a distinct scope — remittances, import-tied payments, internet/telecom, bank accounts. Read the relevance notes; do not fuse them into “pay any MIPYME.”
What changed in 2025–2026
Both regimes are moving fast. Reform Watch tracks the Cuban-side policy in depth — see Reform Watch. The dated milestones below are the ones that change what's legal.
- 2020-12-21GAESA originally placed on the SDN List and Cuba Restricted List
- 2024-05-29CACR amendments effective — 515.340 redefines 'independent private sector entrepreneur'; expanded private-sector general licenses
- 2025-06-30NSPM-5 reissues the Trump-era hard-line Cuba memorandum: escalates pressure on the government, reaffirms the statutory ban on tourism, directs OFAC/Commerce to tighten the CACR, and directs OFAC to broaden the 'prohibited Government of Cuba officials' definition — which would narrow who counts as an eligible independent entrepreneur. Biden-era private-sector general licenses (remittances, U-Turn) remain in effect only until OFAC amends the regulations.
- 2025-07-14First State Department additions to the Cuba Restricted List and Prohibited Accommodations List under NSPM-5 take effect (more military-linked hotels barred).
- 2026-03–05Cuban Gazette / implementing measures discussed diaspora and foreign capital in the private economy — MIPYME-specific equity mechanics remain unsettled / counsel-required; does not create a U.S.-person OFAC equity license
- 2026-06-18National Assembly approves ~176-measure reform package — scraps the state-JV requirement, authorizes private banks, opens foreign/diaspora equity in state & large private firms, lifts the 100-employee cap, allows direct private import/export (Cuban law; does not create a U.S.-person equity license)
- 2026-07-23State Department E.O. 14404 designations, added to OFAC's SDN list, include Terminal de Contenedores de Mariel S.A. and Coral Marítima S.A. — citing a mid-June 2026 port transfer as GAESA-linked sanctions evasion (OFAC recent actions 2026-07-23).
3 · The only lane today
Put the two regimes together and one framed path survives for U.S. persons: remittance/support to independent private sector entrepreneurs under the applicable CACR rules (notably §515.570(g)(3)), with eligibility under §515.340, SDN/CRL screening, a rail that doesn't run on Cuban state-bank or regime-processor rails, and no confiscated-property nexus — often using a sanctions-aware peer-to-peer rail such as QvaPay, whose independent Cuban forex agents bridge the first/last mile. Not equity, not state assets, not a determination that any transfer is authorized. See how support works, the compliance posture, and the OFAC FAQ on digital entrepreneurs in Cuba (open interpretive questions plus our responses).
- • Whether Cuban law actually permits foreign/diaspora equity in MIPYMEs (unverified).
- • How the SDN/secondary-sanctions reach on GAESA and state entities interacts with the CACR private-sector GLs.
- • Helms-Burton Title III exposure for any asset with a confiscation history.
- • Securities-law treatment of any pooled vehicle, even one limited to remittance/payment support.
Confidence: Cuban-law and core OFAC statements above are drawn from primary sources (MINCEX/Ley 118, Gaceta Oficial, Federal Register 2024-11618, OFAC FAQs) and were adversarially verified; Helms-Burton and sanctions secondary-effects statements rest on named law-firm analyses and the ingested OFAC corpus and are not individually court-confirmed here. See Data & methodology. This is research, not legal advice — stand up any structure only with OFAC sanctions counsel and securities counsel.
Common questions
What U.S. laws govern dealings with Cuba?+
Chiefly the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR Part 515), enforced by OFAC, and the 1996 Helms-Burton Act (Titles III and IV). Together they broadly prohibit U.S. persons from investing in Cuba.
What is allowed today?+
Scoped CACR authorizations: remittances under §515.570 (including (g)(3) private-sector support), import-tied payments under §515.582, certain travel categories, internet/telecom services, and humanitarian/donative remittances — never equity, and never dealings with Cuba Restricted List entities. Nothing on this site authorizes a specific transfer.
Can a president lift the Cuba embargo?+
Core embargo provisions, including Helms-Burton, were codified by Congress in 1996, so fully lifting the embargo requires Congress. A president can ease or tighten specific regulations within that framework.